- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A25 vs Redmi Note 12R
Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12R
What Galaxy A25 does better (12) and where Redmi Note 12R wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display5.6
4.2Performance4.7
8.0Camera4.1
3.1Battery4.6
8.0Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A25Redmi Note 12R
| Galaxy A25 | Redmi Note 12R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 168.6 mm | −7.6 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.3 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 199 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A25 better than Redmi Note 12R?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 12R: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 12R: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 12R: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 550 nits+82%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi Note 12R: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Charged in 30 min49% vs 30%+63%
Why is Redmi Note 12R better than Galaxy A25?
- AnTuTu score443,234 vs 555,822+25%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,023 vs 2,249+11%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 550 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,030 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 85.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 443,234 | 555,822 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,023 | 2,249 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 643 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 10.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 49% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.46 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | MIUI 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
