- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A25 vs Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
What Galaxy A25 does better (7) and where Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.7
8.0Camera7.3
3.1Battery7.2
8.0Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A25Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
| Galaxy A25 | Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 164.2 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.1 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 202 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A25 better than Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: No
- 5GYes · Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Weight197 g vs 202 g+2%
- Process5 nm vs 8 nm+60%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G better than Galaxy A25?
- Wired charging25 W vs 67 W2.7×
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,100 nits+10%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.1 mm+2%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.2% vs 86%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue | Star Blue, Graphite Gray, Polar White, Ice blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,030 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 86% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 443,234 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,023 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 643 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 10.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 49% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.46 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | MIUI 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
