- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A25 vs Spark 20C
Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Tecno Spark 20C
What Galaxy A25 does better (21) and where Spark 20C wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display4.0
4.2Performance2.4
8.0Camera4.6
3.1Battery4.6
8.0Features3.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A25Spark 20C
| Galaxy A25 | Spark 20C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 163.7 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.6 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 185 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A25 better than Spark 20C?
- AnTuTu score443,234 vs 195,5392.3×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,023 vs 7812.6×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 450 nits2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Spark 20C: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Spark 20C: No
- 5GYes · Spark 20C: No
- NFCYes · Spark 20C: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 267 ppi+48%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Why is Spark 20C better than Galaxy A25?
- Weight197 g vs 185 g+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue | Mystery White, Alpenglow Gold, Magic Skin, Gravity Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 267 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,030 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | Mediatek Helio G36 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 443,234 | 195,539 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,023 | 781 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 643 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 10.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 49% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.46 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HiOS 12.6 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
