- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A17 vs Blade A76
Samsung Galaxy A17 vs ZTE Blade A76
What Galaxy A17 does better (16) and where Blade A76 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.2
7.8Camera5.4
3.9Battery5.6
7.7Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A17Blade A76
| Galaxy A17 | Blade A76 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 163.6 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 74.9 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm | −1.1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A17 better than Blade A76?
- OLED panelYes · Blade A76: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Blade A76: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 262 ppi+47%
- Memory card slotYes · Blade A76: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade A76: No
- eSIMYes · Blade A76: No
- Drop resistance classB vs D
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Blade A76 better than Galaxy A17?
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A17: Yes
- Repairability classC vs B
- Endurance per cycle44 h vs 47 h+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio86% vs 89.3%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 738 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 89.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Unisoc T8300 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Unisoc |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 435,787 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,048 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 365 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 11.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Yes |
| SAR (head) | 0.67 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 44 h | 47 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | B | D |
