- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A17 vs Redmi 13x
Samsung Galaxy A17 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13x
What Galaxy A17 does better (11) and where Redmi 13x wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.6
7.8Camera5.9
3.9Battery7.1
7.7Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A17Redmi 13x
| Galaxy A17 | Redmi 13x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 168.6 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.3 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 205 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A17 better than Redmi 13x?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi 13x: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi 13x: No
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 550 nits+45%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi 13x: No
- eSIMYes · Redmi 13x: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Weight192 g vs 205 g+7%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.3 mm+11%
Why is Redmi 13x better than Galaxy A17?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A17: Yes
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 396 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 550 nits |
| Measured brightness | 738 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 85.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 435,787 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,048 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 365 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,030 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 11.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.67 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 44 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
