android.gs
Compare
Galaxy A17 vs Y200+

Samsung Galaxy A17 vs Vivo Y200+

What Galaxy A17 does better (15) and where Y200+ wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy A17

7.0Score

15 advantages≈ $155

Higher score

Vivo · 2025Y200+

7.0Score

10 advantages≈ $160

7.0Display6.2

7.8Camera4.1

3.9Battery8.2

7.7Features5.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A17Y200+

	Galaxy A17	Y200+	Difference
Height	164.4 mm	165.7 mm	−1.3 mm
Width	77.9 mm	76 mm	+1.9 mm
Thickness	7.5 mm	8 mm	−0.5 mm
Weight	192 g	199 g	−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A17 better than Y200+?

OLED panelYes · Y200+: No
Optical stabilisationYes · Y200+: No
NFCYes · Y200+: No
Pixel density385 ppi vs 264 ppi+46%
Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
Memory card slotYes · Y200+: No
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y200+: No
eSIMYes · Y200+: No
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
Weight192 g vs 199 g+4%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%

Why is Y200+ better than Galaxy A17?

Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A17: Yes
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,000 nits+25%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A17: Yes
Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A17≈ $1557.0	Vivo Y200+≈ $1607.0
Design
Weight	192 g	199 g
Thickness	7.5 mm	8 mm
Height	164.4 mm	165.7 mm
Width	77.9 mm	76 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP54	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Black, Gray, Blue	Dark Gray, Green, Apricot
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	Super AMOLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	720 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	1,608 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	264 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	800 nits	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	738 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	86%	85.3%
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1330	Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Chip maker	Exynos	Qualcomm
Process	5 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G68 MP2	Adreno 613
AnTuTu score	435,787	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,048	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	365	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/2.76"	—
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	13 MP	5 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	—
Active use (test)	11.8 h	—
Wired charging	25 W	44 W
Charged in 30 min	48%	42%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	4.2
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.4 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.67 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8.5	OriginOS 4
Major OS updates promised	6	—
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	44 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	B	—