- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A17 vs RugKing 3 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A17 vs UleFone RugKing 3 Pro
What Galaxy A17 does better (19) and where RugKing 3 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.2
7.8Camera3.9
3.9Battery5.7
7.7Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A17RugKing 3 Pro
| Galaxy A17 | RugKing 3 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 173.8 mm | −9.4 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 83 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 12.9 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 286 g | −94 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A17 better than RugKing 3 Pro?
- Wired charging25 W vs 10 W2.5×
- OLED panelYes · RugKing 3 Pro: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugKing 3 Pro: No
- 5GYes · RugKing 3 Pro: No
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 500 nits+60%
- Weight192 g vs 286 g+49%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 269 ppi+43%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Why is RugKing 3 Pro better than Galaxy A17?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+14%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 286 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 12.9 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 173.8 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 83 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue | Black, Green, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 738 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 71.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Unisoc |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 435,787 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,048 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 365 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 10 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.67 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 44 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
