- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A16 vs nubia Neo 2
Samsung Galaxy A16 vs ZTE nubia Neo 2
What Galaxy A16 does better (6) and where nubia Neo 2 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display6.9
3.7Performance5.6
6.2Camera5.5
6.2Battery7.8
5.7Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A16nubia Neo 2
| Galaxy A16 | nubia Neo 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 166 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.1 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 208 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A16 better than nubia Neo 2?
- OLED panelYes · nubia Neo 2: No
- Memory card slotYes · nubia Neo 2: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Neo 2: No
- Weight200 g vs 208 g+4%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.5 mm+8%
Why is nubia Neo 2 better than Galaxy A16?
- AnTuTu score387,422 vs 757,199+95%
- 5GNo · Galaxy A16: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A16: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,920 vs 2,392+25%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+23%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Gray, water green, midnight blue | Sunfire Yellow, Frost Silver, Storm Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 808 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 86.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Unisoc T820 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 387,422 | 757,199 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,920 | 2,392 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 345 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 14.7 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.31 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | MyOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 45 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
