- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A16 4G vs Galaxy M35
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G vs Samsung Galaxy M35
What Galaxy A16 4G does better (4) and where Galaxy M35 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display7.4
3.9Performance5.7
6.2Camera8.0
5.3Battery7.5
5.7Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A16 4GGalaxy M35
| Galaxy A16 4G | Galaxy M35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 162.3 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 78.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 9.1 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 222 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A16 4G better than Galaxy M35?
- Weight200 g vs 222 g+11%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 9.1 mm+15%
- Screen-to-body ratio86% vs 83.8%+3%
Why is Galaxy M35 better than Galaxy A16 4G?
- AnTuTu score524,833 vs 768,538+46%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,700 vs 2,758+62%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy A16 4G: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy A16 4G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A16 4G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,000 nits+25%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Galaxy A16 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 222 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 78.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Green | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 806 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 83.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 524,833 | 768,538 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,700 | 2,758 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.96" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.31 W/kg | 0.31 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
