- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A15 vs Galaxy A73 5G
Samsung Galaxy A15 vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
What Galaxy A15 does better (3) and where Galaxy A73 5G wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display7.4
3.4Performance5.5
6.2Camera8.8
6.6Battery5.3
5.7Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A15Galaxy A73 5G
| Galaxy A15 | Galaxy A73 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 163.7 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.1 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 181 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A15 better than Galaxy A73 5G?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A73 5G: No
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Charged in 30 min47% vs 45%+4%
Why is Galaxy A73 5G better than Galaxy A15?
- AnTuTu score316,967 vs 737,2422.3×
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme338 vs 6862×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,928 vs 2,829+47%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy A15: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy A15: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A15: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Galaxy A15: Yes
- Weight200 g vs 181 g+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Brave Black, Optimistic Blue, Magical Blue, Personality Yellow | Gray, Mint, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 808 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 87% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 316,967 | 737,242 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,928 | 2,829 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 338 | 686 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.42 W/kg | 1.28 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | One UI 6.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | 4 |
