- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A15 vs Galaxy A24 4G
Samsung Galaxy A15 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What Galaxy A15 does better (4) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display7.0
3.4Performance3.7
6.2Camera7.8
6.6Battery5.3
5.7Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A15Galaxy A24 4G
| Galaxy A15 | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 162.1 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77.6 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 195 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A15 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.5 LUFS vs -28.9 LUFS+-12%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.3% vs 82.4%+2%
- Charged in 30 min47% vs 46%+2%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Galaxy A15?
- AnTuTu score316,967 vs 398,005+26%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy A15: Yes
- Measured brightness808 nits vs 1,012 nits+25%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,000 nits+25%
- Weight200 g vs 195 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Brave Black, Optimistic Blue, Magical Blue, Personality Yellow | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 808 nits | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 316,967 | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,928 | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 338 | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.42 W/kg | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | 4 |
