- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A15 5G vs Redmi 13C 5G
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G
What Galaxy A15 5G does better (9) and where Redmi 13C 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display4.9
3.2Performance4.2
6.2Camera4.1
5.8Battery4.6
7.4Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A15 5GRedmi 13C 5G
| Galaxy A15 5G | Redmi 13C 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 168.1 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77.9 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 192 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A15 5G better than Redmi 13C 5G?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi 13C 5G: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 260 ppi+52%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 600 nits+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi 13C 5G: No
- Charged in 30 min51% vs 28%+82%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Redmi 13C 5G better than Galaxy A15 5G?
- AnTuTu score306,274 vs 546,817+79%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,747 vs 1,943+11%
- Weight200 g vs 192 g+4%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 168.1 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Magical Blue, Optimistic Blue | Starry Black, Twilight Blue, Starry Silver, Starlight Black, Startrail Green, Startrail Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 786 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 83.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 306,274 | 546,817 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,747 | 1,943 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 335 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 14.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 51% | 28% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.8 W/kg | 0.98 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
