- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A14 5G vs Poco C65
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C65
What Galaxy A14 5G does better (9) and where Poco C65 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display4.9
3.4Performance2.4
5.2Camera4.6
4.0Battery3.1
7.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A14 5GPoco C65
| Galaxy A14 5G | Poco C65 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.7 mm | 168 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 78 mm | = |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.1 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 192 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A14 5G better than Poco C65?
- AnTuTu score307,886 vs 242,885+27%
- 5GYes · Poco C65: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,727 vs 1,201+44%
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 260 ppi+54%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Loudspeaker loudness-26.8 LUFS vs -31.4 LUFS+-15%
Why is Poco C65 better than Galaxy A14 5G?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Measured brightness519 nits vs 607 nits+17%
- Weight202 g vs 192 g+5%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.1 mm+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.2% vs 83.7%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 167.7 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 519 nits | 607 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.2% | 83.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 - SM-A146B | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146B Mali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 307,886 | 242,885 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,727 | 1,201 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.5 h |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 28% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.8 LUFS | -31.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.56 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI Core 7 | HyperOS 2 |
