- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A07 4G vs Poco C71
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G vs Xiaomi Poco C71
What Galaxy A07 4G does better (13) and where Poco C71 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Display5.9
3.7Performance2.4
4.6Camera3.8
4.3Battery5.8
4.3Features2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A07 4GPoco C71
| Galaxy A07 4G | Poco C71 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.4 mm | 171.8 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 77.8 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 193 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A07 4G better than Poco C71?
- Major OS updates promised6 vs 23×
- Wired charging25 W vs 15 W+67%
- Main camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- AnTuTu score394,421 vs 322,517+22%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,941 vs 1,438+35%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+22%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Charged in 30 min43% vs 24%+79%
- Weight184 g vs 193 g+5%
Why is Poco C71 better than Galaxy A07 4G?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 600 nits+33%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 167.4 mm | 171.8 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Gray, Light Violet, Dark Green | Power Black, Cool Blue, Desert Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 468 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 394,421 | 322,517 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,941 | 1,438 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 338 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.7 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | 24% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.19 W/kg | 0.82 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 or Android 15 (Go edition) |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | Android Go |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | 2 |
