- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A06 vs iQOO Z9s
Samsung Galaxy A06 vs Vivo iQOO Z9s
What Galaxy A06 does better (2) and where iQOO Z9s wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Display8.2
2.2Performance6.3
4.6Camera8.1
5.4Battery7.9
3.1Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A06iQOO Z9s
| Galaxy A06 | iQOO Z9s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.3 mm | 163.7 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 75 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 180 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A06 better than iQOO Z9s?
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z9s: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · iQOO Z9s: No
Why is iQOO Z9s better than Galaxy A06?
- AnTuTu score182,064 vs 741,4274.1×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,273 vs 2,9082.3×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,800 nits4×
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- OLED panelNo · Galaxy A06: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy A06: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy A06: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A06: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 167.3 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation |
| Colours | Blue, Gold, White | Titanium Matte, Onyx Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 564 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.8% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 182,064 | 741,427 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,273 | 2,908 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 188 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 13.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.44 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | 2 |
