- android.gs
- Compare
- Xever 8 vs Spark 50 Pro
RugOne Xever 8 vs Tecno Spark 50 Pro
What Xever 8 does better (7) and where Spark 50 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display6.2
6.4Camera4.6
3.2Battery8.4
8.3Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Xever 8Spark 50 Pro
| Xever 8 | Spark 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 167.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 79.2 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 7.8 mm | +6.2 mm |
| Weight | 320 g | 207 g | +113 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Xever 8 better than Spark 50 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 259 ppi+56%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- eSIMYes · Spark 50 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Spark 50 Pro: No
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Spark 50 Pro better than Xever 8?
- Wired charging18 W vs 60 W3.3×
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+25%
- Weight320 g vs 207 g+55%
- Thickness14 mm vs 7.8 mm+79%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio75.9% vs 83.5%+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 320 g | 207 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 167.8 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Black, Sand Dune | Ink Black, Titanium Grey, Midnight Blue, Dynamic Orange, Cloud White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 259 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 680 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.9% | 83.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G200 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 580,813 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,569 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 63% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
