android.gs
Compare
Xever 8 vs Galaxy A57

RugOne Xever 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A57

What Xever 8 does better (5) and where Galaxy A57 wins (19) — every spec side by side.

RugOne · 2026Xever 8

6.8Score

5 advantages≈ $370

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A57

8.8Score

19 advantages≈ $350

Higher score

6.0Display8.1

6.4Camera7.9

3.2Battery6.7

8.3Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Xever 8Galaxy A57

	Xever 8	Galaxy A57	Difference
Height	168 mm	161.5 mm	+6.5 mm
Width	80 mm	76.8 mm	+3.2 mm
Thickness	14 mm	6.9 mm	+7.1 mm
Weight	320 g	179 g	+141 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Xever 8 better than Galaxy A57?

Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy A57: No
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A57: No
Pixel density405 ppi vs 385 ppi+5%

Why is Galaxy A57 better than Xever 8?

Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
Peak brightness680 nits vs 1,900 nits2.8×
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
OLED panelNo · Xever 8: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · Xever 8: Yes
Major OS updates promised3 vs 62×
Weight320 g vs 179 g+79%
Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz+32%
Thickness14 mm vs 6.9 mm2×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Xever 8: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	RugOne Xever 8≈ $3706.8	Samsung Galaxy A57≈ $3508.8
Design
Weight	320 g	179 g
Thickness	14 mm	6.9 mm
Height	168 mm	161.5 mm
Width	80 mm	76.8 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black, Sand Dune	Navy, Gray, Icyblue, Lilac
Display
Screen size	6.5″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED+
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	405 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	680 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,309 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	75.9%	88.8%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	MediaTek Helio G200	Exynos 1680
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.9 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Xclipse 550
AnTuTu score	—	1,001,995
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	4,411
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,742
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.7"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,800 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	14 h
Wired charging	18 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	64%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.7 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 8.5
Major OS updates promised	3	6
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,200
Endurance per cycle	—	52 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A