android.gs
Compare
Xever 7 vs Camon 40 Pro

RugOne Xever 7 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro

What Xever 7 does better (9) and where Camon 40 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.

RugOne · 2025Xever 7

8.7Score

9 advantages≈ $500

Higher score

Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Pro

8.6Score

10 advantages

8.6Display8.5

8.2Camera9.1

7.6Battery7.3

7.8Features7.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Xever 7Camon 40 Pro

	Xever 7	Camon 40 Pro	Difference
Height	173.6 mm	164.3 mm	+9.3 mm
Width	84.4 mm	74.6 mm	+9.8 mm
Thickness	14.1 mm	7.3 mm	+6.8 mm
Weight	325 g	179 g	+146 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Xever 7 better than Camon 40 Pro?

Peak brightness2,200 nits vs 1,100 nits2×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Battery capacity5,550 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+7%
Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
eSIMYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%

Why is Camon 40 Pro better than Xever 7?

Stereo speakersNo · Xever 7: Yes
Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
Weight325 g vs 179 g+82%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Max video1080p vs 4K
4K selfie videoNo · Xever 7: Yes
Thickness14.1 mm vs 7.3 mm+93%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Screen-to-body ratio73.3% vs 89.7%+22%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	RugOne Xever 7≈ $5008.7	Tecno Camon 40 Pro8.6
Design
Weight	325 g	179 g
Thickness	14.1 mm	7.3 mm
Height	173.6 mm	164.3 mm
Width	84.4 mm	74.6 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Black, Beige	Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,436 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,200 nits	1,100 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,045 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.3%	89.7%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7025	Mediatek Dimensity 7300
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	700,909
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	3,218
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	873
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.9
Main sensor size	—	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,550 mAh	5,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.8 h
Wired charging	33 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-28.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.93 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised	3	3
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	59 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	A	—