- android.gs
- Compare
- Xever 7 vs Camon 40 Premier
RugOne Xever 7 vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier
What Xever 7 does better (8) and where Camon 40 Premier wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display9.0
8.2Camera9.4
7.6Battery6.3
7.8Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Xever 7Camon 40 Premier
| Xever 7 | Camon 40 Premier | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.6 mm | 161 mm | +12.6 mm |
| Width | 84.4 mm | 75 mm | +9.4 mm |
| Thickness | 14.1 mm | 7.7 mm | +6.4 mm |
| Weight | 325 g | 193 g | +132 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Xever 7 better than Camon 40 Premier?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,550 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+9%
- Peak brightness2,200 nits vs 1,600 nits+38%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 40 Premier better than Xever 7?
- Wired charging33 W vs 70 W2.1×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Xever 7: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Xever 7: Yes
- Weight325 g vs 193 g+68%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+34%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Xever 7: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 460 ppi+16%
- Thickness14.1 mm vs 7.7 mm+83%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 325 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 14.1 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 173.6 mm | 161 mm |
| Width | 84.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Beige | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,200 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 658 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.3% | 89% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,418,376 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,224 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,911 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4. |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,550 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.93 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 59 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25vsTecno Camon 40 Premier8.98.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsTecno Camon 40 Premier8.98.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgevsTecno Camon 40 Premier8.88.8
vs
Motorola Edge 60 FusionvsTecno Camon 40 Premier8.88.8
vs
Tecno Camon 40 PremiervsInfinix GT 30 Pro8.88.8
vs
Google Pixel 9avsTecno Camon 40 Premier8.88.8

