How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Xever 7 vs Camon 40 Premier

RugOne Xever 7 vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier

What Xever 7 does better (8) and where Camon 40 Premier wins (14) — every spec side by side.

RugOne Xever 7
RugOne · 2025Xever 7
8.7Score
8 advantages≈ $500
vs
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Premier
8.8Score
14 advantages
Higher score
8.6Display9.0
8.2Camera9.4
7.6Battery6.3
7.8Features7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Xever 7Camon 40 Premier
84.4 × 173.614.175 × 1617.7
Xever 7Camon 40 PremierDifference
Height173.6 mm161 mm+12.6 mm
Width84.4 mm75 mm+9.4 mm
Thickness14.1 mm7.7 mm+6.4 mm
Weight325 g193 g+132 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Xever 7 better than Camon 40 Premier?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  2. Battery capacity5,550 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+9%
  3. Peak brightness2,200 nits vs 1,600 nits+38%
  4. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. Memory card slotYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
  6. eSIMYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
  7. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
  8. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%

Why is Camon 40 Premier better than Xever 7?

  1. Wired charging33 W vs 70 W2.1×
  2. Telephoto cameraNo · Xever 7: Yes
  3. Stereo speakersNo · Xever 7: Yes
  4. Weight325 g vs 193 g+68%
  5. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  6. CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+34%
  7. Max video1080p vs 4K
  8. 4K selfie videoNo · Xever 7: Yes
  9. Pixel density395 ppi vs 460 ppi+16%
  10. Thickness14.1 mm vs 7.7 mm+83%
  11. Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
  12. Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

RugOne Xever 7RugOne Xever 7≈ $5008.7
Design
Weight325 g193 g
Thickness14.1 mm7.7 mm
Height173.6 mm161 mm
Width84.4 mm75 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlack, BeigeEmerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,800 px
Pixel density395 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness2,200 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness—658 nits
Screen-to-body ratio73.3%89%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7025Mediatek Dimensity 8350
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.5 GHz3.35 GHz
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali G615-MC6
AnTuTu score—1,418,376
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,224
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,911
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size—1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video1080p4K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,550 mAh5,100 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—11.6 h
Wired charging33 W70 W
Charged in 30 min—75%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth5.25.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-28 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.93 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised33
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle59 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare