How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Xever 7 Pro vs Poco F7

RugOne Xever 7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7

What Xever 7 Pro does better (8) and where Poco F7 wins (18) — every spec side by side.

RugOne Xever 7 Pro
RugOne · 2025Xever 7 Pro
8.5Score
8 advantages≈ $660
vs
Xiaomi Poco F7
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7
9.3Score
18 advantages≈ $620
Higher score
8.6Display9.4
7.6Camera8.8
7.6Battery8.6
7.8Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Xever 7 ProPoco F7
84.4 × 173.614.177.9 × 163.18.2
Xever 7 ProPoco F7Difference
Height173.6 mm163.1 mm+10.5 mm
Width84.4 mm77.9 mm+6.5 mm
Thickness14.1 mm8.2 mm+5.9 mm
Weight325 g216 g+109 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Xever 7 Pro better than Poco F7?

  1. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  2. Memory card slotYes · Poco F7: No
  3. eSIMYes · Poco F7: No
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco F7: No
  5. Energy classA vs B
  6. Repairability classB vs C
  7. Drop resistance classA vs D
  8. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%

Why is Poco F7 better than Xever 7 Pro?

  1. Wired charging33 W vs 90 W2.7×
  2. Stereo speakersNo · Xever 7 Pro: Yes
  3. Battery capacity5,550 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+17%
  4. Weight325 g vs 216 g+51%
  5. Peak brightness2,200 nits vs 3,200 nits+45%
  6. CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+28%
  7. Ultra-wide cameraNo · Xever 7 Pro: Yes
  8. Max video1080p vs 4K
  9. Pixel density395 ppi vs 447 ppi+13%
  10. Thickness14.1 mm vs 8.2 mm+72%
  11. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+2%
  12. Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco F7Xiaomi Poco F7≈ $6209.3
Design
Weight325 g216 g
Thickness14.1 mm8.2 mm
Height173.6 mm163.1 mm
Width84.4 mm77.9 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlack, BeigeBlack, White, Cyber Silver
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,772 px
Pixel density395 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,200 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,525 nits
Screen-to-body ratio73.3%90.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7025Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.5 GHz3.21 GHz
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Adreno 825
AnTuTu score—2,024,751
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,402
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,476
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.5
Main sensor size—1/1.95"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p4K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,550 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging33 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—80%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.26
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.93 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised3—
EU label
Energy classAB
Battery charge cycles1,0001,000
Endurance per cycle59 h64 h
Repairability classBC
Drop resistance classAD
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare