- android.gs
- Compare
- X50 Pro Player vs Black Shark 3
Realme X50 Pro Player vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3
What X50 Pro Player does better (6) and where Black Shark 3 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display6.5
7.1Camera8.0
4.8Battery6.8
7.9Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
X50 Pro PlayerBlack Shark 3
| X50 Pro Player | Black Shark 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159 mm | 168.7 mm | −9.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 77.3 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 10.4 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 222 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X50 Pro Player better than Black Shark 3?
- NFCYes · Black Shark 3: No
- Weight209 g vs 222 g+6%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 10.4 mm+17%
- Charged in 30 min86% vs 79%+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 82.4%+3%
Why is Black Shark 3 better than X50 Pro Player?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · X50 Pro Player: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X50 Pro Player: Yes
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,720 mAh+12%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X50 Pro Player: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 222 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 10.4 mm |
| Height | 159 mm | 168.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Aluminium |
| Glass protection | Unspecified | — |
| Colours | Light Speed Silver, Phantom Black | Lightning Black, Armor Gray, Star Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 82.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,720 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
