- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 70T vs Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Realme Note 70T vs Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
What Note 70T does better (8) and where Galaxy XCover7 Pro wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display5.8
2.7Camera6.7
6.6Battery2.8
3.2Features9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 70TGalaxy XCover7 Pro
| Note 70T | Galaxy XCover7 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 168.6 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 79.9 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 10.2 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 240 g | −39 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 70T better than Galaxy XCover7 Pro?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,350 mAh+38%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy XCover7 Pro: No
- Energy classA vs B
- Weight201 g vs 240 g+19%
- Endurance per cycle65 h vs 38 h+71%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 10.2 mm+29%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.6% vs 77.9%+10%
Why is Galaxy XCover7 Pro better than Note 70T?
- Main camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- 5GNo · Note 70T: Yes
- NFCNo · Note 70T: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Note 70T: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 400 ppi+54%
- Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+39%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 240 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 10.2 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 79.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Gold, Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 77.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 961,191 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,315 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,350 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.81 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 5.0 | One UI 8 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 65 h | 38 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
