- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo vs Galaxy A51
Realme Narzo vs Samsung Galaxy A51
What Narzo does better (6) and where Galaxy A51 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display5.0
6.5Camera8.1
3.2Battery2.6
3.5Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
NarzoGalaxy A51
| Narzo | Galaxy A51 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 158.5 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 73.6 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.9 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 172 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo better than Galaxy A51?
- Wired charging30 W vs 15 W2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+7%
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 400 nits+20%
- Charged in 30 min55% vs 34%+62%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
Why is Galaxy A51 better than Narzo?
- OLED panelNo · Narzo: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo: Yes
- Rear cameras2 vs 42×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+12%
- Weight191 g vs 172 g+11%
- Process12 nm vs 10 nm+20%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.9 mm+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 87.4%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 158.5 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Just Black, Just White | White, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 635 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 87.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90T | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Process | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali G72 MP3 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 352,699 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,204 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | 34% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 2 |
