- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo Power vs Pova 8 Pro
Realme Narzo Power vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
What Narzo Power does better (7) and where Pova 8 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.6
8.1Camera8.0
9.5Battery8.4
5.7Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo PowerPova 8 Pro
| Narzo Power | Pova 8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.3 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 7.4 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Weight | 219 g | 189 g | +30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo Power better than Pova 8 Pro?
- Battery capacity10,001 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+54%
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Peak brightness6,500 nits vs 4,500 nits+44%
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 429 ppi+6%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,208 px+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.2% vs 89.2%+2%
Why is Pova 8 Pro better than Narzo Power?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo Power: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Narzo Power: Yes
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Narzo Power: Yes
- Weight219 g vs 189 g+16%
- Charged in 30 min42% vs 56%+33%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 7.4 mm+23%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 219 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Titan Silver, Titan Blue | Arc White, Graphite Black, Tundra Green, Tonino Lamborghini Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 89.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 994,646 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,200 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,001 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 42% | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 7.0 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
