- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 90 vs Redmi 15 5G
Realme Narzo 90 vs Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
What Narzo 90 does better (12) and where Redmi 15 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display7.3
5.0Performance5.0
6.2Camera4.6
8.9Battery8.3
6.6Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 90Redmi 15 5G
| Narzo 90 | Redmi 15 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.4 mm | 169.5 mm | −11.1 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 80.4 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 217 g | −36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 90 better than Redmi 15 5G?
- Wired charging60 W vs 33 W+82%
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 700 nits5.7×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- OLED panelYes · Redmi 15 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi 15 5G: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- Weight181 g vs 217 g+20%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+9%
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 374 ppi+6%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.4 mm+8%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.2% vs 85.6%+3%
Why is Redmi 15 5G better than Narzo 90?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo 90: Yes
- AnTuTu score588,662 vs 632,934+8%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,130 vs 2,183+2%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 217 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 158.4 mm | 169.5 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 80.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Dragontrail Star D+ | Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Victory Gold, Carbon Black | Black, Gray, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 700 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.2% | 85.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 Max | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 588,662 | 632,934 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,130 | 2,183 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | 1/2.88" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 33% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 6.0 | HyperOS 2.2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 67 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
