- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 90 vs Pova Curve
Realme Narzo 90 vs Tecno Pova Curve
What Narzo 90 does better (7) and where Pova Curve wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display9.2
5.0Performance6.4
6.2Camera6.3
8.9Battery8.0
6.6Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 90Pova Curve
| Narzo 90 | Pova Curve | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.4 mm | 164.3 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 74.6 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 188 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 90 better than Pova Curve?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,300 nits3.1×
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+27%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Wired charging60 W vs 45 W+33%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Memory card slotYes · Pova Curve: No
- Weight181 g vs 188 g+4%
Why is Pova Curve better than Narzo 90?
- AnTuTu score588,662 vs 906,240+54%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo 90: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,130 vs 3,097+45%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Narzo 90: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 7.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 158.4 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Dragontrail Star D+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Victory Gold, Carbon Black | Neon Cyan, Magic Silver, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.2% | 89.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 Max | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 588,662 | 906,240 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,130 | 3,097 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 6.0 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
