- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80x vs Galaxy A17
Realme Narzo 80x vs Samsung Galaxy A17
What Narzo 80x does better (6) and where Galaxy A17 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display7.0
5.1Camera7.8
8.2Battery3.9
6.0Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80xGalaxy A17
| Narzo 80x | Galaxy A17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 164.4 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.9 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 192 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80x better than Galaxy A17?
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 800 nits+19%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
Why is Galaxy A17 better than Narzo 80x?
- OLED panelNo · Narzo 80x: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo 80x: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 80x: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 80x: Yes
- eSIMNo · Narzo 80x: Yes
- Weight197 g vs 192 g+3%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.5 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | ArmorShell glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Deep Ocean, Sunlit Gold | Black, Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 738 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 435,787 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,048 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 365 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | — | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.67 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 44 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
