- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80 Pro vs Redmi Note 15 5G
Realme Narzo 80 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
What Narzo 80 Pro does better (8) and where Redmi Note 15 5G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display9.0
7.0Performance6.5
7.5Camera8.2
8.9Battery8.1
6.7Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80 ProRedmi Note 15 5G
| Narzo 80 Pro | Redmi Note 15 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 178 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80 Pro better than Redmi Note 15 5G?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- AnTuTu score985,745 vs 830,765+19%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,520 mAh+9%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,200 nits+41%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+8%
- Charged in 30 min71% vs 55%+29%
Why is Redmi Note 15 5G better than Narzo 80 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density391 ppi vs 405 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 7.4 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Racing Green, Speed Silver | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 3,286 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 91.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 985,745 | 830,765 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,923 | 2,972 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 6.0 | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
