- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80 Pro vs Y200 4G
Realme Narzo 80 Pro vs Vivo Y200 4G
What Narzo 80 Pro does better (14) and where Y200 4G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display8.4
7.0Performance3.9
7.5Camera5.9
8.9Battery7.4
6.7Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80 ProY200 4G
| Narzo 80 Pro | Y200 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.2 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.9 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 188 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80 Pro better than Y200 4G?
- AnTuTu score985,745 vs 448,5092.2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,923 vs 1,524+92%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y200 4G: No
- 5GYes · Y200 4G: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Weight179 g vs 188 g+5%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Y200 4G better than Narzo 80 Pro?
- Memory card slotNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+8%
- Charged in 30 min71% vs 80%+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Racing Green, Speed Silver | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 86.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 985,745 | 448,509 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,923 | 1,524 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 6.0 | Funtouch 14 |
