- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80 Pro vs Pova 7 Pro
Realme Narzo 80 Pro vs Tecno Pova 7 Pro
What Narzo 80 Pro does better (9) and where Pova 7 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display9.8
7.0Performance6.9
7.5Camera7.0
8.9Battery8.7
6.7Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80 ProPova 7 Pro
| Narzo 80 Pro | Pova 7 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.9 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 195 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80 Pro better than Pova 7 Pro?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 7 Pro: No
- AnTuTu score985,745 vs 933,528+6%
- Weight179 g vs 195 g+9%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Charged in 30 min71% vs 58%+22%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+8%
Why is Pova 7 Pro better than Narzo 80 Pro?
- Wireless chargingNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,923 vs 3,091+6%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density391 ppi vs 440 ppi+13%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Racing Green, Speed Silver | Geek Black, Dynamic Grey, Neon Cyan |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 89.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 985,745 | 933,528 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,923 | 3,091 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 6.0 | HIOS 15 |
