- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80 Lite vs Galaxy A07 4G
Realme Narzo 80 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
What Narzo 80 Lite does better (3) and where Galaxy A07 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display4.2
2.7Camera4.6
6.8Battery4.3
3.8Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80 LiteGalaxy A07 4G
| Narzo 80 Lite | Galaxy A07 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 167.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 77.4 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 184 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80 Lite better than Galaxy A07 4G?
- Battery capacity6,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+26%
- Peak brightness563 nits vs 450 nits+25%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.6% vs 83.6%+2%
Why is Galaxy A07 4G better than Narzo 80 Lite?
- Main camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- Wired charging15 W vs 25 W+67%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Weight201 g vs 184 g+9%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.6 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 167.4 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | — |
| Colours | Beach Gold, Obsidian Black | Gray, Light Violet, Dark Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 563 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 468 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 83.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 394,421 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,941 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 338 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,300 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.7 h |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 43% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.19 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
