- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80 Lite 5G vs Redmi 15C 4G
Realme Narzo 80 Lite 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G
What Narzo 80 Lite 5G does better (5) and where Redmi 15C 4G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display6.4
3.8Camera4.6
6.6Battery7.8
4.5Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80 Lite 5GRedmi 15C 4G
| Narzo 80 Lite 5G | Redmi 15C 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 171.6 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 79.5 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 205 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80 Lite 5G better than Redmi 15C 4G?
- 5GYes · Redmi 15C 4G: No
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Weight197 g vs 205 g+4%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 254 ppi+4%
Why is Redmi 15C 4G better than Narzo 80 Lite 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 33 W2.2×
- Main camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo 80 Lite 5G: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Peak brightness625 nits vs 810 nits+30%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 171.6 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Crystal Purple, Onyx Black | Moonlight Blue, Mint Green, Midnight Gray, Twilight Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 625 nits | 810 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 361,928 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,384 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.1" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
