- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80 Lite 5G vs Redmi 15 4G
Realme Narzo 80 Lite 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G
What Narzo 80 Lite 5G does better (6) and where Redmi 15 4G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display7.3
3.8Camera4.6
6.6Battery8.3
4.5Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80 Lite 5GRedmi 15 4G
| Narzo 80 Lite 5G | Redmi 15 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 171.1 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 82.1 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 224 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80 Lite 5G better than Redmi 15 4G?
- 5GYes · Redmi 15 4G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi 15 4G: No
- Weight197 g vs 224 g+14%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+9%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 83.2%+2%
Why is Redmi 15 4G better than Narzo 80 Lite 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 33 W2.2×
- Main camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo 80 Lite 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+17%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 374 ppi+42%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+17%
- Peak brightness625 nits vs 700 nits+12%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 224 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 171.1 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Crystal Purple, Onyx Black | Midnight Black, Titan Gray, Sandy Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 625 nits | 700 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 621 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 83.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,376 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,529 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.1" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
