- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 50 vs Galaxy A73 5G
Realme Narzo 50 vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
What Narzo 50 does better (2) and where Galaxy A73 5G wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display7.4
5.5Camera8.8
6.0Battery5.3
3.5Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 50Galaxy A73 5G
| Narzo 50 | Galaxy A73 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 163.7 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 76.1 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 181 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 50 better than Galaxy A73 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A73 5G: No
Why is Galaxy A73 5G better than Narzo 50?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Narzo 50: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo 50: Yes
- 5GNo · Narzo 50: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 50: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Narzo 50: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 50: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Speed Blue, Speed Black | Gray, Mint, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | 87% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 737,242 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,829 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 686 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.28 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 2 | One UI 6.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
