- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 30 vs Redmi K40 Pro+
Realme Narzo 30 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
What Narzo 30 does better (5) and where Redmi K40 Pro+ wins (22) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Display7.9
5.7Camera8.3
5.5Battery4.2
5.0Features7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 30Redmi K40 Pro+
| Narzo 30 | Redmi K40 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 163.7 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 76.4 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 196 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 30 better than Redmi K40 Pro+?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,520 mAh+11%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K40 Pro+: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K40 Pro+: No
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Weight192 g vs 196 g+2%
Why is Redmi K40 Pro+ better than Narzo 30?
- Main camera48 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Peak brightness580 nits vs 1,300 nits2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Narzo 30: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · Narzo 30: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Narzo 30: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
- Process12 nm vs 5 nm2.4×
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+39%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Racing Blue, Racing Silver | Black, White, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 580 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4% | 85.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 660 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,520 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 2.0 | MIUI 12 |
