- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 20 vs Galaxy XCover Pro
Realme Narzo 20 vs Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
What Narzo 20 does better (7) and where Galaxy XCover Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Display4.1
5.3Camera5.7
7.0Battery2.7
3.5Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 20Galaxy XCover Pro
| Narzo 20 | Galaxy XCover Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.5 mm | 159.9 mm | +4.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.7 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.8 mm | 10 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 218 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 20 better than Galaxy XCover Pro?
- Main camera48 MP vs 25 MP+92%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh+48%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Weight208 g vs 218 g+5%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.3″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.7% vs 79.4%+3%
Why is Galaxy XCover Pro better than Narzo 20?
- NFCNo · Narzo 20: Yes
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 409 ppi+51%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process12 nm vs 10 nm+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 9.8 mm | 10 mm |
| Height | 164.5 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Glory Silver, Victory Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 560 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 79.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Exynos 9611 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 25 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,050 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.03 W/kg | 0.47 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
