- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 20 Pro vs Redmi Note 9 Pro
Realme Narzo 20 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
What Narzo 20 Pro does better (6) and where Redmi Note 9 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display4.2
6.5Camera7.2
5.2Battery6.8
3.5Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 20 ProRedmi Note 9 Pro
| Narzo 20 Pro | Redmi Note 9 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 165.8 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 76.7 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 209 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 20 Pro better than Redmi Note 9 Pro?
- Wired charging65 W vs 30 W2.2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Weight191 g vs 209 g+9%
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 450 nits+7%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 9 Pro better than Narzo 20 Pro?
- NFCNo · Narzo 20 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+12%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+12%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Thickness9.4 mm vs 8.8 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | White Knight, Black Ninja | Tropical Green, Glacier White, Interstellar Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 614 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4% | 84.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 279,625 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,785 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 315 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | 0.66 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 11 |
