- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 20 Pro vs Mi 10T Pro 5G
Realme Narzo 20 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
What Narzo 20 Pro does better (5) and where Mi 10T Pro 5G wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display6.9
6.5Camera9.3
5.2Battery6.0
3.5Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 20 ProMi 10T Pro 5G
| Narzo 20 Pro | Mi 10T Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 165.1 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 76.4 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 9.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 218 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 20 Pro better than Mi 10T Pro 5G?
- Wired charging65 W vs 33 W+97%
- Memory card slotYes · Mi 10T Pro 5G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Mi 10T Pro 5G: No
- Weight191 g vs 218 g+14%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
Why is Mi 10T Pro 5G better than Narzo 20 Pro?
- Main camera48 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo 20 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · Narzo 20 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 20 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Narzo 20 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+39%
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 650 nits+35%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 165.1 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | White Knight, Black Ninja | Cosmic Black, Lunar Silver, Aurora Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 630 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4% | 85.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 563,961 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,311 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.33" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | 0.57 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 12.5 |
