- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 100 Lite vs Poco C81 Pro
Realme Narzo 100 Lite vs Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
What Narzo 100 Lite does better (11) and where Poco C81 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display6.3
4.1Performance2.6
2.7Camera3.4
7.2Battery6.6
4.5Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 100 LitePoco C81 Pro
| Narzo 100 Lite | Poco C81 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.3 mm | 171.6 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 79.5 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 208 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 100 Lite better than Poco C81 Pro?
- AnTuTu score550,626 vs 401,382+37%
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- 5GYes · Poco C81 Pro: No
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+17%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,009 vs 1,457+38%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 800 nits+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio87% vs 84.3%+3%
Why is Poco C81 Pro better than Narzo 100 Lite?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo 100 Lite: Yes
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 166.3 mm | 171.6 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | — |
| Colours | Frost Silver, Thunder Black | Black, Gold, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,570 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 550,626 | 401,382 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,009 | 1,457 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/3.06" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 7.0 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 67 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
