- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 10 vs Poco F2 Pro
Realme Narzo 10 vs Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
What Narzo 10 does better (6) and where Poco F2 Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Display5.7
6.0Camera8.4
4.6Battery4.1
2.4Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 10Poco F2 Pro
| Narzo 10 | Poco F2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 163.3 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 75.4 mm | = |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 219 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 10 better than Poco F2 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+6%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Poco F2 Pro: No
- Weight199 g vs 219 g+10%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Poco F2 Pro better than Narzo 10?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 30 W+67%
- OLED panelNo · Narzo 10: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Narzo 10: Yes
- 5GNo · Narzo 10: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 10: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 395 ppi+47%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+42%
- Max video1080p vs 8K
- Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | That White, That Green | Neon Blue, Phantom White, Electric Purple, Cyber Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 854 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 87.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 538,221 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,332 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,104 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Max video | 1080p | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.86 W/kg | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 14 |
