- android.gs
- Compare
- GT2 Pro vs Redmi K40S
Realme GT2 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K40S
What GT2 Pro does better (13) and where Redmi K40S wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display7.9
9.1Camera8.0
6.9Battery5.5
8.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT2 ProRedmi K40S
| GT2 Pro | Redmi K40S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.2 mm | 163.2 mm | = |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 76 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT2 Pro better than Redmi K40S?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Pixel density526 ppi vs 395 ppi+33%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,300 nits+8%
- Process4 nm vs 7 nm+75%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%
- Charged in 30 min91% vs 79%+15%
Why is Redmi K40S better than GT2 Pro?
- Wired charging65 W vs 67 W+3%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
- Weight199 g vs 195 g+2%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.7 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 163.2 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 76 mm |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO2 AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,216 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 526 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 778 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 86.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 966,251 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,501 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,564 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 91% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.16 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 5.0 | MIUI 13 |
