- android.gs
- Compare
- GT2 Explorer Master vs Black Shark 4 Pro
Realme GT2 Explorer Master vs Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro
What GT2 Explorer Master does better (9) and where Black Shark 4 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display8.5
8.6Camera8.0
7.7Battery6.6
7.4Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT2 Explorer MasterBlack Shark 4 Pro
| GT2 Explorer Master | Black Shark 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.8 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 76.4 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.9 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 220 g | −25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT2 Explorer Master better than Black Shark 4 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Black Shark 4 Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight195 g vs 220 g+13%
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+12%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 9.9 mm+21%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.4% vs 85.8%+5%
Why is Black Shark 4 Pro better than GT2 Explorer Master?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · GT2 Explorer Master: Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 6+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Ceramic | — |
| Colours | Gray, White, Gold | Shadow Black, Misty Grey, Cosmos Black, Dark Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 798 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 85.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,045,876 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,021 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 300% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (China only) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
