- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Neo5 SE vs Redmi Turbo 3
Realme GT Neo5 SE vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
What GT Neo5 SE does better (5) and where Redmi Turbo 3 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.8
8.1Performance8.4
7.2Camera8.8
8.8Battery7.6
8.1Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT Neo5 SERedmi Turbo 3
| GT Neo5 SE | Redmi Turbo 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 160.5 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.4 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 179 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Neo5 SE better than Redmi Turbo 3?
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Wired charging100 W vs 90 W+11%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is Redmi Turbo 3 better than GT Neo5 SE?
- AnTuTu score1,416,021 vs 1,823,082+29%
- Optical stabilisationNo · GT Neo5 SE: Yes
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 2,400 nits+71%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,949 vs 3,019+55%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,315 vs 4,989+16%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Weight193 g vs 179 g+8%
- CPU frequency2.91 GHz vs 3 GHz+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Thickness9 mm vs 7.8 mm+15%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Gradient | Black, Green, Titanium, Harry Potter |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 2,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 89.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.91 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,416,021 | 1,823,082 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,315 | 4,989 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,949 | 3,019 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 7.0 | HyperOS |
