- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Neo vs Mi 10T 5G
Realme GT Neo vs Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
What GT Neo does better (11) and where Mi 10T 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT NeoMi 10T 5G
| GT Neo | Mi 10T 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.5 mm | 165.1 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.4 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.3 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 216 g | −37 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Neo better than Mi 10T 5G?
- Wired charging50 W vs 33 W+52%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · Mi 10T 5G: No
- Weight179 g vs 216 g+21%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Mi 10T 5G: No
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+6%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 60%+57%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.3 mm+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Mi 10T 5G better than GT Neo?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 216 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 158.5 mm | 165.1 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Aurora | Cosmic Black, Lunar Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 615 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 85.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,005,146 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,265 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,095 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 50 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 60% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.57 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 12.5 |
