- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Neo vs Galaxy A52s 5G
Realme GT Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
What GT Neo does better (6) and where Galaxy A52s 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display7.4
7.8Camera8.7
5.1Battery3.2
8.7Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT NeoGalaxy A52s 5G
| GT Neo | Galaxy A52s 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.5 mm | 159.9 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 75.1 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 179 g | 189 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Neo better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- Wired charging50 W vs 25 W2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+25%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 53%+77%
- Weight179 g vs 189 g+6%
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than GT Neo?
- Optical stabilisationNo · GT Neo: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · GT Neo: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · GT Neo: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 158.5 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Aurora | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 84.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 429,675 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 11,060 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 685 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 50 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.88 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6 |
