- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Neo Flash vs Xperia 5 III
Realme GT Neo Flash vs Sony Xperia 5 III
What GT Neo Flash does better (9) and where Xperia 5 III wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display7.6
7.8Camera9.2
5.2Battery3.8
8.7Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT Neo FlashXperia 5 III
| GT Neo Flash | Xperia 5 III | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.5 mm | 157 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 68 mm | +5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 168 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Neo Flash better than Xperia 5 III?
- Main camera64 MP vs 12 MP5.3×
- Wired charging65 W vs 30 W2.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Charged in 30 min86% vs 50%+72%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+6%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.1″+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.9% vs 81.4%+6%
Why is Xperia 5 III better than GT Neo Flash?
- Optical stabilisationNo · GT Neo Flash: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · GT Neo Flash: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · GT Neo Flash: Yes
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 449 ppi+10%
- Weight179 g vs 168 g+7%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 158.5 mm | 157 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 68 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Aurora, Yellow | Black, Green, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 590 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 81.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 708,394 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,549 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3. |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 4.4× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 2.0 | — |
