- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 5G vs Redmi K40 Gaming
Realme GT 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
What GT 5G does better (7) and where Redmi K40 Gaming wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.2
7.8Camera7.2
5.2Battery8.0
8.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 5GRedmi K40 Gaming
| GT 5G | Redmi K40 Gaming | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.5 mm | 161.9 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.9 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 205 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 5G better than Redmi K40 Gaming?
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 500 nits2×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K40 Gaming: No
- Weight186 g vs 205 g+10%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Charged in 30 min86% vs 71%+21%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
Why is Redmi K40 Gaming better than GT 5G?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,065 mAh+13%
- Wired charging65 W vs 67 W+3%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3 GHz+6%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 158.5 mm | 161.9 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Dragontrail | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Gold/Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 650 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 86.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 703,986 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,555 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,529 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,065 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 4.0 | MIUI 12.5 |
