- android.gs
- Compare
- C75 5G vs Galaxy A26
Realme C75 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A26
What C75 5G does better (7) and where Galaxy A26 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Display7.5
4.6Camera8.0
8.1Battery3.2
6.7Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
C75 5GGalaxy A26
| C75 5G | Galaxy A26 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 164 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.5 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 200 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C75 5G better than Galaxy A26?
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A26: No
- Battery capacity5,828 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+17%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Energy classA vs C
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Weight196 g vs 200 g+2%
Why is Galaxy A26 better than C75 5G?
- OLED panelNo · C75 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · C75 5G: Yes
- NFCNo · C75 5G: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · C75 5G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- eSIMNo · C75 5G: Yes
- Peak brightness690 nits vs 800 nits+16%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.7 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | — | Black, White, Mint, Peach Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 690 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 86.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Exynos 1380 - Global |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Exynos |
| Process | — | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 - Global Mali-G68 - LATAM |
| AnTuTu score | — | 579,811 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,768 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 794 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,828 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.7 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 51% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | C |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 37 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
