- android.gs
- Compare
- 9i vs Galaxy XCover6 Pro
Realme 9i vs Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
What 9i does better (8) and where Galaxy XCover6 Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display5.8
2.9Performance5.2
5.5Camera6.7
6.0Battery3.0
6.2Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
9iGalaxy XCover6 Pro
| 9i | Galaxy XCover6 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 168.8 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 79.9 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.9 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 235 g | −45 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 9i better than Galaxy XCover6 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh+23%
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy XCover6 Pro: No
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Weight190 g vs 235 g+24%
- Measured brightness512 nits vs 493 nits+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.9 mm+18%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.2% vs 77.8%+8%
Why is Galaxy XCover6 Pro better than 9i?
- AnTuTu score229,368 vs 697,4313×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,581 vs 2,842+80%
- 5GNo · 9i: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · 9i: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 500 nits+4%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
- Charged in 30 min54% vs 70%+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 235 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 168.8 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 79.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Dragontrail Pro Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 512 nits | 493 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 77.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 229,368 | 697,431 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,581 | 2,842 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.48 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 5.0 | One UI 8.0 |
