- android.gs
- Compare
- 16T vs Xever 8
Realme 16T vs RugOne Xever 8
What 16T does better (10) and where Xever 8 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
16TXever 8
| 16T | Xever 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.4 mm | 168 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 80 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 14 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Weight | 224 g | 320 g | −96 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 16T better than Xever 8?
- Wired charging45 W vs 18 W2.5×
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+67%
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 680 nits+76%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight224 g vs 320 g+43%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+5%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 14 mm+59%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.1% vs 75.9%+15%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Xever 8 better than 16T?
- NFCNo · 16T: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · 16T: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Pixel density254 ppi vs 405 ppi+59%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- eSIMNo · 16T: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 16T: Yes
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 224 g | 320 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 166.4 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 80 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Panda-1681 glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Starlight Red, Starlight Black, Aurora Green | Black, Sand Dune |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,570 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 680 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.1% | 75.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 438,780 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,016 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 385 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.93" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 22.7 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 7.0 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
